Summary
Climate change poses significant challenges to sheep production systems, affecting key traits such as productivity, health, and reproductive performance. Farmers' selection criteria for breeding stock vary by production system, with rams often chosen for growth-related traits (e.g., body size, feed efficiency) and ewes for maternal characteristics (e.g., lamb survival, mothering ability). Local breeds demonstrate greater resilience to environmental stressors—including heat, drought, and disease than exotic breeds, highlighting the importance of genetic diversity in climate adaptation. Effective breeding strategies should integrate traditional knowledge with modern genomic tools to enhance selection for climate-resilient traits while meeting farmer preferences. Community-based breeding programs and targeted management interventions (e.g., strategic supplementation, shade provision) can further support adaptation. Future research should prioritize the conservation of genetic diversity, optimization of genomic selection, and ethical considerations to ensure sustainable sheep production under changing climatic conditions.
Introduction
The complex interplay between climatic factors and sheep keepers' trait preferences significantly shapes breeding objectives and adaptation strategies (Rose et al., 2015; Sejian et al., 2017). Climate change presents substantial challenges to sheep production systems through multiple pathways: (1) direct physiological impacts including heat/cold stress and water scarcity, (2) nutritional constraints from reduced forage quality and quantity, and (3) increased disease and parasite prevalence across ecological zones (Kumar et al., 2017; Ngcobo et al., 2025; Tüfekci & Çelik, 2021). These multifaceted pressures compromise sheep productivity, health, and reproductive performance, necessitating adaptive breeding programs and management interventions to ensure sustainable production (Mohamed-Brahmi et al., 2024).
Sheep keeper traits preferences for rams and ewes
Sheep keepers' traits preferences for rams and ewes (see Table 1) are influenced by various factors, including breeding objectives, economic values, and cultural practices (Duguma et al., 2011; Japaro, 2022; Marshall et al., 2016). These preferences often differ between smallholder farmers and pastoralists and across production systems (Getachew et al., 2008).
Table 1. Trait preferences among sheep keepers for rams and ewes
|
Sex |
Trait Category |
Description |
Key References |
|
Rams & Ewes |
Body Size & Conformation |
Preferred for meat production, market value, and reproductive performance |
Japaro (2022); Yitayew et al. (2024) |
|
Disease Resistance |
Reduces the need for treatment and enhances animal welfare |
Khalfaoui et al. (2024) |
|
|
Rams |
Coat Color & Appearance |
Regional aesthetic preferences often linked to breed or market demands |
Japaro (2022) |
|
Fertility & Libido |
Assessed via mating behavior and semen quality; crucial for breeding success |
Khan et al. (2019) |
|
|
Growth & Feed Efficiency |
Improves flock productivity, especially in intensive systems |
Zhao et al. (2022) |
|
|
Ewes |
Mothering Ability |
Encompasses lambing ease, milk production, and care behavior |
Japaro (2022); Pesántez-Pacheco et al. (2019) |
|
Fertility & Lambing Interval |
Short intervals and high fertility increase lamb output over a ewe’s lifetime |
BK et al. (2021) |
|
|
Wool Quality (wool breeds) |
Traits like fiber diameter, staple length, and fleece weight are valued |
Zhao et al. (2021) |
Regional and contextual trait preferences
Trait preferences for sheep are not uniform across regions or production systems. Instead, they are strongly shaped by local agroecological conditions, production goals, and cultural values. These contextual differences influence how farmers prioritize traits in both rams and ewes. For a clearer understanding, Table 2 below summarizes key regional and contextual variations in trait preferences across selected countries and settings.
Table 2. Regional and contextual trait preferences
|
Region/Country |
Trait Preferences & Context |
Reference |
|
Ethiopia |
Traits vary by agro-ecology; highland farmers prefer body size, growth rate, reproductive performance |
Duguma et al. (2011); Abebe et al. (2020) |
|
West Africa |
Breeding goals linked to income, culture, and savings; multifunctionality shapes preferences |
Dossa et al. (2015) |
|
Kenya |
Focus on productivity and adaptability in Red Maasai and Dorper breeds |
König et al. (2015) |
|
Ireland |
Breeding objectives adapted to lowland vs. hill systems with varying economic trait weights |
Byrne et al. (2012) |
Climate change impacts on sheep traits
Climate change, particularly heat stress, negatively affects various sheep traits. High temperatures can lead to reduced body growth, compromised hide quality, and impaired male and female reproductive functions (Sejian et al., 2017). Thermal stress diverts energy resources towards adaptive mechanisms, reducing productivity (Wanjala et al., 2022). Extreme environmental conditions also increase the risk of nutritional stress and water scarcity, further affecting sheep performance (Kumar et al., 2017).
Impact on growth traits
Meta-analyses confirm that environmental factors account for significant variation in ovine growth traits (Sharif et al., 2022). Breed-specific studies reveal these effects in Makuie sheep (birth weight, weaning weight, yearling weight (Rahimi et al., 2014) and Akkaraman sheep (birth weight, average daily gain (Behrem, 2021), demonstrating consistent environmental impacts across diverse genotypes.
Impact reproductive traits
The detrimental effects of climate change on sheep reproduction - including disrupted estrous cycles, reduced conception rates, and increased embryonic mortality (Kumar et al., 2017; Ngcobo et al., 2025) - are mediated through both thermal stress and hematological changes (Al-Thuwaini, 2021). These findings underscore the importance of adaptive management strategies, particularly shifting mating periods to late summer to avoid peak thermal stress (Mohamed-Brahmi et al., 2024).
Impact on breed traits
Native sheep breeds demonstrate superior adaptation to harsh environmental conditions compared to exotic breeds (Haile et al., 2011), largely due to their genetic diversity, which enhances climatic adaptability (Wanjala et al., 2025). Identifying the specific genetic variations underlying these adaptive traits can inform targeted breeding programs for improved resilience.
Adaptation strategies to counter climate change
To mitigate the impacts of climate change, sheep keepers are employing various adaptation strategies (Mohamed-Brahmi et al., 2024):
Selection for resilience
Breeding for resilience to weather variation is an essential climate adaptation strategy (Sánchez-Molano et al., 2020). This approach focuses on selecting animals capable of maintaining stable performance despite environmental fluctuations.
Use of local breeds
The natural resistance of local sheep breeds to food and water scarcity (Mohamed-Brahmi et al., 2024) makes them ideal candidates for community-based breeding programs aimed at optimizing their genetic potential in harsh environments (Haile et al., 2011; Mirkena et al., 2011).
Improved management practices
Effective climate adaptation strategies encompass vegetation management (selecting resistant forage shrubs with controlled grazing), infrastructure provision (shelter and shade), and optimized nutrition (strategic supplementation with high-quality concentrates during physiological stress periods) (Mohamed-Brahmi et al., 2024).
Genomic resources for sheep breeding
The integration of genomic technologies is revolutionizing sheep breeding through: (1) enhanced selection accuracy via genetic markers (Amiri & Rahim, 2024), (2) improved characterization of adaptive genetic diversity (Han et al., 2024), and (3) development of advanced breeding strategies (Woolley et al., 2023).
A range of adaptation strategies has been proposed and applied to enhance the resilience of sheep production systems under increasing climate variability. These strategies aim to address climate-induced constraints such as heat stress, feed and water scarcity, and reduced reproductive performance. The table below summarizes key climate-smart breeding and management approaches, their specific implementation actions, the constraints they target, and the relevant animal trait preferences. The content is synthesized from leading studies in the field (see Table 3)
Table 3. Adaptation Strategies to Counter Climate Change
|
Adaptation Strategy |
Implementation Actions |
Targeted Constraints |
Relevant Trait Preferences |
|
1. Selection for Resilience |
-Select animals that maintain performance under climate stress (heat, feed/water scarcity) |
Reproductive decline, health issues, low feed efficiency |
Fertility & Libido (rams) Fertility & Lambing Interval (ewes)Disease Resistance |
|
2. Use of Local Breeds |
-Promote rustic/native breeds with tolerance to harsh conditions |
Feed scarcity, water shortage, heat stress |
Disease Resistance Growth & Feed EfficiencyFertility |
|
3. Improved Management Practices |
-Introduce drought-resistant forage shrubs and delay sowing for feed alignment -Provide shelter/shade and multiple water sources - Reduce flock size and manage indoor fattening -Supplement during critical periods -Apply rotational grazing and forage storage |
Forage scarcity, water availability, heat stress, disease exposure |
Growth & Feed Efficiency Body Size & Conformation Mothering Ability Disease Resistance |
|
4. Genomic Resources for Breeding |
-Use genetic markers for selecting adaptive traits -Characterize local adaptive genes -Develop precision breeding programs |
Breeding inefficiency, low adaptation accuracy |
Fertility Disease Resistance Growth & Feed Efficiency |
Conclusion
Climate change poses significant challenges to sheep production systems, affecting productivity, health, and reproductive performance. This necessitates climate-resilient breeding strategies that integrate environmental adaptation with sheep keepers' trait preferences. A combined approach leveraging traditional knowledge and genomic technologies can enhance selection for resilience, productivity, and adaptability. Future research priorities should focus on: (1) assessing and conserving genetic diversity, (2) optimizing genomic selection tools, and (3) addressing ethical considerations in breeding programs.
References
- Abebe, A. S., Alemayehu, K., Johansson, A. M., & Gizaw, S. (2020). Breeding practices and trait preferences of smallholder farmers for indigenous sheep in the northwest highlands of Ethiopia: Inputs to design a breeding program. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0233040.
- Al-Thuwaini, T. M. (2021). The relationship of hematological parameters with adaptation and reproduction in sheep; A review study. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 35(3), 575–580.
- BEHREM, S. (2021). Effects of Environmental Factors Growth Traits of Akkaraman Sheep in Çankırı Province. Livestock Studies, 61(1), 22–27.
- BK, A., HB, A., H, B., & GE, S. (2021). On Farm Reproductive Performance and Trait Preferences of Sheep and Goat in Pastoral and Agro-Pastoral Areas of Afar Regional State, Ethiopia. Journal of Animal Science and Research, 5(1).
- Byrne, T. J., Amer, P. R., Fennessy, P. F., Hansen, P., & Wickham, B. W. (2012). A preference-based approach to deriving breeding objectives: applied to sheep breeding. Animal, 6(5), 778–788.
- Dossa, L. H., Sangaré, M., Buerkert, A., & Schlecht, E. (2015). Production objectives and breeding practices of urban goat and sheep keepers in West Africa: regional analysis and implications for the development of supportive breeding programs. SpringerPlus, 4(1).
- Duguma, G., Mirkena, T., Haile, A., Okeyo, A. M., Tibbo, M., Rischkowsky, B., Sölkner, J., & Wurzinger, M. (2011). Identification of smallholder farmers and pastoralists’ preferences for sheep breeding traits: choice model approach. Animal, 5(12), 1984–1992.
- El Amiri, B., & Rahim, A. (2024). Exploring Endogenous and Exogenous Factors for Successful Artificial Insemination in Sheep: A Global Overview. Veterinary Sciences, 11(2), 86.
- El Khalfaoui, N., El Amiri, B., Rahim, A., Chentouf, M., Raes, M., Marcotty, T., & Kirschvink, N. (2024). Longitudinal Follow-Up of Clinical Superficial Ovine Caseous Lymphadenitis. Animals, 14(24), 3641.
- Haile, A., Mirkena, T., Duguma, G., Getachew, T., Edea, Z., Tibbo, M., Iñiguez, L., Rischkowsky, B., Okeyo, A., Wurzinger, M., & Sölkner, J. (2011). Community-based breeding programs to exploit genetic potential of adapted local sheep breeds in Ethiopia. In FOOD SECURITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE IN DRY AREAS, 255, 2011.
- Han, Z., Yang, R., Zhou, W., Zhang, L., Wang, J., Liu, C., & Liu, S. (2024). Population structure and selection signal analysis of indigenous sheep from the southern edge of the Taklamakan Desert. BMC Genomics, 25(1).
- Japaro, A. M. (2022). Breeding Objectives and Trait Preferences of Farmers for Sheep in Ethiopia. EAS Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 4(2), 19–24.
- Khan, K. I., Hossain, I., Momin, M., Miah, G., Quader, N., & Miazi, O. F. (2019). Traits of Sheep and Effects of Protein Supplements on Semen Profile in Indigenous Sheep of Bangladesh. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak Dan Veteriner, 24(2), 73–80.
- Kumar, D., De, K., Sejian, V., & Naqvi, S. M. K. (2017). Impact of Climate Change on Sheep Reproduction. In Sheep Production Adapting to Climate Change (pp. 71–93). Springer Singapore.
- Kumar, D., De, K., Sejian, V., & Naqvi, S. M. K. (2017). Impact of Climate Change on Sheep Reproduction. In Sheep Production Adapting to Climate Change (pp. 71–93). Springer Singapore.
- Marshall, K., Mtimet, N., Wanyoike, F., Ndiwa, N., Ghebremariam, H., Mugunieri, L., & Costagli, R. (2016). Traditional livestock breeding practices of men and women Somali pastoralists: trait preferences and selection of breeding animals. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 133(6), 534–547.
- Mirkena, T., Duguma, G., Willam, A., Wurzinger, M., Haile, A., Rischkowsky, B., Okeyo, A. M., Tibbo, M., & Solkner, J. (2011). Community‐based alternative breeding plans for indigenous sheep breeds in four agro‐ecological zones of Ethiopia. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 129(3), 244–253.
- Mohamed-Brahmi, A., Ameur, M., Mekki, I., Tenza-Peral, A., Nasraoui, M., Yagoubi, Y., Smeti, S., Ben Saïd, S., Atti, N., Lobón, S., & Mahouachi, M. (2024). Analysis of Management Practices and Breeders’ Perceptions of Climate Change’s Impact to Enhance the Resilience of Sheep Production Systems: A Case Study in the Tunisian Semi-Arid Zone. Animals, 14(6), 885.
- Ngcobo, J. N., Egerszegi, I., & Nephawe, K. A. (2025). Recent Advances in Understanding the Impact of Environmental Heat Stress on Sheep Production and Reproductive Performance: A Subtropical Climate Perspective. Climate, 13(6), 130.
- Pesántez-Pacheco, J. L., Heras-Molina, A., Torres-Rovira, L., Sanz-Fernández, M. V., García-Contreras, C., Vázquez-Gómez, M., Feyjoo, P., Cáceres, E., Frías-Mateo, M., Hernández, F., Martínez-Ros, P., González-Martin, J. V., González-Bulnes, A., & Astiz, S. (2019). Maternal Metabolic Demands Caused by Pregnancy and Lactation: Association with Productivity and Offspring Phenotype in High-Yielding Dairy Ewes. Animals, 9(6), 295.
- Rahimi, S. M., Rafat, S. A., & Jafari, S. (2014). Effects of environmental factors on growth traits in Makuie sheep. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 30(2), 185–192.
- Rose, G., Mulder, H. A., Thompson, A. N., van der Werf, J. H. J., & van Arendonk, J. A. M. (2015). Breeding objectives for sheep should be customised depending on variation in pasture growth across years. Animal, 9(8), 1268–1277.
- Sánchez-Molano, E., Kapsona, V. V., Oikonomou, S., McLaren, A., Lambe, N., Conington, J., & Banos, G. (2020). Breeding strategies for animal resilience to weather variation in meat sheep. BMC Genetics, 21(1).
- Sejian, V., Samal, L., Soren, N. M., Bagath, M., Krishnan, G., Vidya, M. K., Archana, P. R., Pragna, P., Hyder, I., Maurya, V. P., Mortlock, M. Y., & Bhatta, R. (2017). Adaptation Strategies to Counter Climate Change Impact on Sheep. In Sheep Production Adapting to Climate Change (pp. 413–430). Springer Singapore.
- Sharif, N., Ali, A., Dawood, M., Khan, M. I.-R., & Do, D. N. (2022). Environmental Effects and Genetic Parameters for Growth Traits of Lohi Sheep. Animals, 12(24), 3590.
- TÜFEKCİ, H., & TOZLU ÇELİK, H. (2021). Effects of Climate Change on Sheep and Goat Breeding. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 4(4), 137–145.
- Wanjala, G., Bagi, Z., Gavojdian, D., Badaoui, B., Astuti, P. K., Mizeranschi, A., Ilisiu, E., Ohran, H., Juhas, E. P., Loukovitis, D., Kawęcka, A., Šveistienė, R., Becskei, Z., Strausz, P., Kichamu, N., & Kusza, S. (2025). Genetic diversity and adaptability of native sheep breeds from different climatic zones. Scientific Reports, 15(1).
- Wanjala, G., Kusuma Astuti, P., Bagi, Z., Kichamu, N., Strausz, P., & Kusza, S. (2023). A review on the potential effects of environmental and economic factors on sheep genetic diversity: Consequences of climate change. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 30(1), 103505.
- Wanjala, G., Bagi, Z., Gavojdian, D., Badaoui, B., Astuti, P. K., Mizeranschi, A., Ilisiu, E., Ohran, H., Juhas, E. P., Loukovitis, D., Kawęcka, A., Šveistienė, R., Becskei, Z., Strausz, P., Kichamu, N., & Kusza, S. (2025). Genetic diversity and adaptability of native sheep breeds from different climatic zones. Scientific Reports, 15(1).
- Yitayew, A., Kassie, G. T., Abduali, A., & Nigussie, Z. (2024). Willingness to pay for sheep traits and their heterogeneous effects on prices: Evidence from primary livestock markets in Ethiopia. PLOS ONE, 19(9), e0308651.
- Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Li, F., Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Song, Q., Li, C., Zhao, L., Wang, J., Xu, D., Cheng, J., Li, W., Lin, C., Zhou, B., & Wang, W. (2022). Estimation of genetic correlations of two key feed efficiency traits with production traits in male Hu sheep. Animal Biotechnology, 34(7), 2805–2816.
- Zonabend König, E., Mirkena, T., Strandberg, E., Audho, J., Ojango, J., Malmfors, B., Okeyo, A. M., & Philipsson, J. (2015). Participatory definition of breeding objectives for sheep breeds under pastoral systems—the case of Red Maasai and Dorper sheep in Kenya. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 48(1), 9–20.


