Bioherbicides: Sustainable Alternatives to Chemical Herbicides
As the challenges posed by the uncautious use of conventional herbicides and the increasing problem of herbicide-resistant weed species become increasingly apparent, the search for sustainable alternatives has gained momentum. This has led to the exploration of bioherbicides derived from natural sources, which offer a greener solution to weed management. While chemical herbicides have revolutionized agriculture by improving weed control and boosting food production, they have many adverse effects, including environmental pollution, phytotoxicity, and health risks.
In contrast, bioherbicides present a promising alternative by leveraging natural plant extracts and microbial metabolites. These alternatives break down quickly in the environment, minimizing their ecological footprint and reducing potential health risks. Unlike their synthetic counterparts, bioherbicides are designed to target specific weed processes while leaving minimal impact on non-target organisms and ecosystems.
The transition from chemical to bioherbicides addresses the pressing environmental and health issues associated with traditional herbicides and aligns with the broader goal of sustainable agriculture. Integrating these natural solutions can enhance weed control efficiency while promoting environmental stewardship and safeguarding human health.
In this context, understanding both the benefits and limitations of conventional herbicides alongside the advantages of bioherbicides is crucial for developing effective, sustainable weed management strategies.
Can bioherbicides replace traditional herbicides?
Bioherbicides, derived from natural sources, offer an environmentally friendly alternative to traditional chemical herbicides. Since their commercialization in 1980, bioherbicides have gained attention for their quick breakdown in the environment and their safety profile. These innovative solutions can be produced from plants or microbes and are specifically designed to disrupt biological processes in weeds, hindering their growth and development. Research indicates that plant extracts exhibit effective bioherbicidal properties, such as mustard seed meal and microbial metabolites. Various plant extracts and microbial species have been identified as powerful bioherbicides capable of reducing weed germination and growth through multiple biochemical pathways.
Benefits of Herbicides
Herbicides have been crucial in increasing food production by enhancing weed control. They offer several advantages:
- Efficiency: Herbicides act quickly, are readily available, and reduce the need for labor-intensive hand weeding.
- Modern Agriculture: They replace traditional weed management practices, contributing to the efficiency of contemporary farming methods.
Adverse Effects of Chemical Herbicides
Despite their benefits, chemical herbicides come with significant drawbacks:
- Phytotoxicity and Environmental Harm: Repeated and improper use of herbicides can lead to phytotoxicity and environmental damage.
- Impact on Non-Target Organisms and Human Health: Herbicides can adversely affect non-target species and human health.
- Residual Risks: Residual herbicides threaten subsequent crops and contaminate the food chain.
- Ecosystem Damage: Chemical herbicides harm terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Improper handling and excessive exposure can result in acute poisoning and severe health hazards.
- Resistance Issues: The development of genetically modified (GM) herbicide-resistant crops has led to the emergence of herbicide-resistant weed species. Integrated weed management practices are essential to delay resistance and sustain agricultural productivity.
Advantages of Bioherbicides
Bioherbicides offer several key benefits over synthetic herbicides:
- Environmental Safety: Being derived from natural sources, bioherbicides minimize environmental pollution and reduce health risks.
- Reduced Pollution: They contribute to less soil and water contamination, promoting a healthier ecosystem.
- Sustainable Agriculture: By decreasing reliance on synthetic chemicals, bioherbicides support sustainable agricultural practices and help maintain ecological balance.
Table 1: Effects of Plant Derivatives and Microbial Bioherbicides on Weed:
| Bioherbicides | Components | Effect on Weed Species | References |
| Eucalyptus globulus Labill | Aqueous extracts (phenolic compounds) | Affected germination, growth, photosynthetic pigments, and protein contents | (Puig et al., 2018) |
| Atriplex cana Ledeb | Essential oil | Inhibited seed germination and seedling growth | (Wei et al., 2019) |
| Ammi visnaga (L.) Lam. | Plant extract (khellin and visnagin) | Negatively influenced growth and physiology, disrupted membrane properties, and caused cell death | (Travaini et al., 2016) |
| Drimys brasiliensis (Miers) | Root extract | Affected seed germination, seedling growth, and cell division | (Anese et al., 2015) |
| Canavalia ensiformis | Leaf and seed extract (chlorogenic acid, p-anisic acid, naringin, and rutin) | Decreased weed growth | (Mendes & Rezende, 2014) |
| Microbial Bioherbicides | Components | Effects | References |
| Phoma commelinicola | Spore | Disease induction, dry weight reduction, and mortality | (Boyette & Hoagland, 2015) |
| Alternaria destruens L. Simmons, strain 059 | Smoulder | Acted against Cuscuta species | (Cordeau et al., 2016) |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa (strain C1501) | 2-(Hydroxymethyl) phenol | Controlled Amaranthus hybridus weed, a potential bioherbicide for other weeds | (Adetunji et al., 2019) |
Conclusion
While herbicides are essential for effective weed control and boosting food production, they pose serious risks to plant health, environmental integrity, and human well-being. Herbicides can cause phytotoxicity, degrade crop quality, contribute to soil and water contamination, and develop herbicide-resistant weeds. Health issues associated with herbicides range from acute symptoms to chronic disorders. To address these challenges, adopting integrated weed management strategies and utilizing bioherbicides offer a more sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative. Bioherbicides, sourced from natural materials, present a promising solution to reduce the adverse effects of synthetic herbicides, promoting both environmental conservation and sustainable agriculture. Proper pesticide use and continued development of bioherbicides are crucial for advancing agricultural sustainability and protecting our planet.
References
Adetunji, C. O., Oloke, J. K., Bello, O. M., Pradeep, M., & Jolly, R. S. (2019). Isolation, structural elucidation and bioherbicidal activity of an eco-friendly bioactive 2-(hydroxymethyl) phenol, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (C1501) and its ecotoxicological evaluation on soil. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 13, 304-317.
Anese, S., Jatobá, L., Grisi, P., Gualtieri, S., Santos, M. F. C., & Berlinck, R. G. d. S. (2015). The bioherbicidal activity of drimane sesquiterpenes from Drimys brasiliensis Miers roots. Industrial Crops and Products, 74, 28-35.
Aravind, P., & Prasad, M. N. V. (2005). Modulation of cadmium-induced oxidative stress in Ceratophyllum demersum by zinc involves ascorbate–glutathione cycle and glutathione metabolism. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 43(2), 107-116.
Áy, Z., Mihály, R., Cserháti, M., Kótai, É., & Pauk, J. (2012). The effect of high concentrations of glufosinate ammonium on the yield components of transgenic spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) constitutively expressing the bar gene. The Scientific World Journal, 2012(1), 657945.
Boyette, C. D., & Hoagland, R. E. (2015). The bioherbicidal potential of Xanthomonas campestris for controlling Conyza canadensis. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 25(2), 229-237.
Cakmak, I., Yazici, A., Tutus, Y., & Ozturk, L. (2009). Glyphosate reduced seed and leaf concentrations of calcium, manganese, magnesium, and iron in non-glyphosate-resistant soybeans. European Journal of Agronomy, 31(3), 114-119.
Chandrakar, C., Shrivastava, G., & Anjum Ahmad, A. A. (2014). Impact of water management, weed and integrated nutrient management on weed parameters and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum).
Chaudhary, S. U., Iqbal, J., Hussain, M., & Ali, M. A. (2010). Comparison of different herbicidal application methods for weed control in wheat. J. Agric. Res, 48(2), 193-200.
Chhokar, R., & Malik, R. (2002). Isoproturon-resistant littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor) and its response to alternate herbicides. Weed technology, 16(1), 116-123.
Cordeau, S., Triolet, M., Wayman, S., Steinberg, C., & Guillemin, J.-P. (2016). Bioherbicides: Dead in the water? A review of the existing products for integrated weed management. Crop Protection, 87, 44-49.
Ding, W., Reddy, K. N., Zablotowicz, R. M., Bellaloui, N., & Bruns, H. A. (2011). Physiological responses of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-sensitive soybean to aminomethylphosphonic acid, a metabolite of glyphosate. Chemosphere, 83(4), 593-598.
Duke, S. O., & Powles, S. B. (2008). Glyphosate: a once‐in‐a‐century herbicide. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science, 64(4), 319-325.
Gomes, M. P., Richardi, V. S., Bicalho, E. M., da Rocha, D. C., Navarro-Silva, M. A., Soffiatti, P., Garcia, Q. S., & Sant’Anna-Santos, B. F. (2019). Effects of Ciprofloxacin and Roundup on seed germination and root development of maize. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 2671-2678.
Hamim, H., Violita, V., Triadiati, T., & Miftahudin, M. (2017). Oxidative stress and photosynthesis reduction of cultivated (Glycine max L.) and wild soybean (G. tomentella L.) exposed to drought and paraquat.
Jiang, L.-X., Jin, L.-G., Guo, Y., Tao, B., & Qiu, L.-J. (2013). Glyphosate effects on the gene expression of the apical bud in soybean (Glycine max). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 437(4), 544-549.
Liu, X., Qi, C., Wang, Z., Li, Y., Wang, Q., Guo, M., & Cao, A. (2014). Effect of picloram herbicide on physiological responses of Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng. Chilean journal of agricultural research, 74(4), 438-444.
Mendes, I. D. S., & Rezende, M. O. O. (2014). Assessment of the allelopathic effect of leaf and seed extracts of Canavalia ensiformis as postemergent bioherbicides: A green alternative for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 49(5), 374-380.
Orcaray, L., Zulet, A., Zabalza, A., & Royuela, M. (2012). Impairment of carbon metabolism induced by the herbicide glyphosate. Journal of plant physiology, 169(1), 27-33.
Puig, C. G., Reigosa, M. J., Valentão, P., Andrade, P. B., & Pedrol, N. (2018). Unravelling the bioherbicide potential of Eucalyptus globulus Labill: Biochemistry and effects of its aqueous extract. PloS one, 13(2), e0192872.
Rajashekar, N., Prakasha, P., & Murthy, T. (2012). Seed germination and physiological behavior of maize (cv. NAC-6002) seedlings under abiotic stress (pendimethalin) condition.
Serra, A.-A., Nuttens, A., Larvor, V., Renault, D., Couée, I., Sulmon, C., & Gouesbet, G. (2013). Low environmentally relevant levels of bioactive xenobiotics and associated degradation products cause cryptic perturbations of metabolism and molecular stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of experimental botany, 64(10), 2753-2766.
Travaini, M. L., Sosa, G. M., Ceccarelli, E. A., Walter, H., Cantrell, C. L., Carrillo, N. J., Dayan, F. E., Meepagala, K. M., & Duke, S. O. (2016). Khellin and visnagin, furanochromones from Ammi visnaga (L.) Lam., as potential bioherbicides. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 64(50), 9475-9487.
Wei, C., Zhou, S., Li, W., Jiang, C., Yang, W., Han, C., Zhang, C., & Shao, H. (2019). Chemical composition and allelopathic, phytotoxic and pesticidal activities of Atriplex cana Ledeb.(Amaranthaceae) essential oil. Chemistry & Biodiversity, 16(4), e1800595.
Wu, G. L., Cui, J., Tao, L., & Yang, H. (2010). Fluroxypyr triggers oxidative damage by producing superoxide and hydrogen peroxide in rice (Oryza sativa). Ecotoxicology, 19, 124-132.
Xu, L., Zhang, W., Ali, B., Islam, F., Zhu, J., & Zhou, W. (2015). Synergism of herbicide toxicity by 5-aminolevulinic acid is related to physiological and ultra-structural disorders in crickweed (Malachium aquaticum L.). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 125, 53-61.
Yanniccari, M., Tambussi, E., Istilart, C., & Castro, A. M. (2012). Glyphosate effects on gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of two Lolium perenne L. biotypes with differential herbicide sensitivity. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 57, 210-217.
Yin, X. L., Jiang, L., Song, N. H., & Yang, H. (2008). Toxic reactivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants to herbicide isoproturon. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 56(12), 4825-4831.
Zablotowicz, R. M., & Reddy, K. N. (2007). Nitrogenase activity, nitrogen content, and yield responses to glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Crop Protection, 26(3), 370-376.
Zhou, Q., Liu, W., Zhang, Y., & Liu, K. K. (2007). Action mechanisms of acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 89(2), 89-96.
Zobiole, L. H. S., de Oliveira Jr, R. S., Kremer, R. J., Constantin, J., Bonato, C. M., & Muniz, A. S. (2010). Water use efficiency and photosynthesis of glyphosate-resistant soybean as affected by glyphosate. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 97(3), 182-193.
